There was a time when local council elections occupied roughly the same space in the national consciousness as a damp parish newsletter announcing a new treasurer for the bowls club. You woke up the next morning to discover Labour had gained six seats in somewhere called North East Fenland Rural, the Conservatives had lost control of a district council nobody could locate on a map, and a man dressed as a traffic cone had won in Ashington on a platform of reopening the public toilets.
Then everyone moved on.
Now apparently we require full DEFCON 1 election coverage because Swindon has elected three Reform councillors and a Lib Dem with a beard made entirely from sourdough starter.
The BBC has been treating these local elections like the fall of Saigon. Radio 4 schedules vanish. Normal programming disappears. Suddenly there are sombre graphics, giant touchscreen maps and presenters speaking in hushed tones about “voter realignment in the outer commuter belt”. You half expect a retired brigadier to appear beside a digital map of Lincolnshire moving little coloured arrows around while explaining the collapse of the traditional vote in Kettering South East Drainage Ward.
The oddity is that many of the country are not even voting.
Large parts of Britain are carrying on entirely unaware that democracy is apparently hanging by a thread in Dudley. Most people are still mostly concerned with the cost of food, energy bills, whether the car passes its MOT, and why their WiFi drops out every time somebody uses the microwave. In our case the microwave also causes the kitchen lights to flicker slightly, which probably says more about British infrastructure than another six hours of election graphics.
Yet Westminster media has decided these elections represent the final battle for civilisation itself.
Part of this is structural. Continuous news requires continuous drama. “Council maintains broadly competent waste collection service” does not really justify a six-hour special. But “Starmer Faces Existential Crisis After Bin Collection Swing In Basildon” can fill an entire afternoon without anybody needing to leave the studio.
And poor old Keir Starmer has apparently been on the verge of political death continuously since about mid-2025.
Every week there is another article suggesting his authority has collapsed. Another “mounting pressure” piece. Another “Labour panic”. Another anonymous backbencher claiming “colleagues are concerned”. If Westminster journalists were medical staff, Starmer would have been declared clinically dead eighteen months ago, only to sit up every morning asking whether anyone had seen his briefing papers.
Yet here he still is.
That is because political journalism now operates like football punditry mixed with Love Island. Nobody reports politics as a slow institutional process anymore. It is all swings, momentum, humiliations, comebacks, body language, “optics”, and anonymous MPs “warning” things. Cabinet ministers are discussed like underperforming midfielders. Polling movements of about 2% are treated like the collapse of the Western Roman Empire.
Brexit did not help. For several years prime ministers genuinely did collapse at absurd speed. Theresa May staggered from crisis to crisis. Boris Johnson eventually exploded in a cloud of cake crumbs and ethics investigations. Liz Truss managed to crash the bond markets before some people had even located the downstairs lavatory at Number 10. After that, Westminster started behaving like a man who had one genuinely catastrophic gearbox failure and now interprets every faint rattling noise as imminent mechanical destruction.
The media became addicted to collapse.
Now every wobble is treated as the opening scene of another execution. The problem is that most governments are not actually that dramatic. Unpopular governments can survive for years provided MPs fear the alternative more. Labour MPs may grumble about Starmer, but they have also spent years watching the Conservatives cycle through leaders like a man desperately trying random fuses in a broken lawnmower while insisting he definitely understands electrics.
There is also the small matter that Westminster political discourse increasingly confuses social media with the country itself. Spend too long on political Twitter and you would think Britain was entering the closing days of the Weimar Republic. In reality, most of the population are making tea, arguing with their energy supplier and wondering why the dishwasher now requires software updates. Half the country probably could not name their local councillor even after accidentally voting for him.
The rise of Nigel Farage has amplified all this because he generates attention in the way a small kitchen fire generates attention. The media cannot resist him. Every Reform gain becomes either the death of Labour, the death of the Conservatives, the death of liberal democracy, or occasionally all three before lunchtime.
Some of these trends may indeed matter long term. British politics probably is fragmenting. Traditional loyalties probably are weakening. But modern political coverage no longer distinguishes between “important gradual shift” and “imminent collapse of the regime by Thursday teatime”.
So we end up with council elections being presented like D-Day, Starmer being politically pronounced dead every fortnight despite continuing to attend Cabinet meetings, and Radio 4 abandoning normal programming because somebody in Warwickshire has elected an independent candidate angry about cycle lanes.
Meanwhile the bins still need collecting, the roads still resemble the surface of the moon, and somewhere in Britain a newly elected councillor is discovering that his first actual responsibility is not saving the nation, but chairing a tense subcommittee meeting about the opening hours of the recycling centre.


No comments:
Post a Comment