Apparently there's concern over the amount of salt in salt, fat in butter and sugar in sugar.
Time
3 hours ago
Thursday, 29 November 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Your Host
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(331)
-
▼
November
(29)
- Vilifying Leveson - Woof
- Health Scare!
- Meths Pricing
- CSI Gourmet Burger
- Tribal Rules for the Galaxy Note 2
- Uniform Post
- The National Elf
- Lunatics Are Running the Asylum
- The Other Half
- The Distaff Side
- A Load of Horse Poo in Superman's Gaol
- Time-Wasting Arab Celebrations
- Price of Alcohol in Gaza
- 20 Turbines Please in Gaza
- PCC Travisty in IKEA for Celebs in Need
- Out of Hand
- Standards in Journalism at Hotels
- Excess as a Lifestyle Choice
- Eton Mess
- It's an Air-Source Heat Pump Jim, But Not as We Kn...
- Nominations for the Daily Mail
- It's An Age Thing for Archbishops
- The Female of the Species
- Tight Fit
- I Wonder About Politicians
- Teenage Mobile Winter Clothes Syndrome
- Porridge
- Magical Religions & Bras
- The Savile Enquiry.
-
▼
November
(29)
My Blog List
-
-
-
Musical Conflagration1 day ago
-
1343 - Allegro Non Troppo6 days ago
-
How The Left Stopped Thinking1 year ago
-
-
Professing !4 years ago
-
AAAARRRRGHHHHHH....6 years ago
-
A Beef with Beans6 years ago
-
The Marriage of Souls7 years ago
-
-
Next stage of the glass panel...8 years ago
-
From China: Sepia Saturday 21810 years ago
-
-
1 comment:
Indeed. They put far more sugar in sugar these days than they used to.
Sx
Post a Comment