Politics

I'm going to comment on politics - something I never do.... Well, maybe occasionally.

Rishi Sunak had a career at Goldman Sachs before entering politics. Now, working for an investment bank involves understanding and managing risk, but how on earth could he ever feasibly expect to return to investment banking after the gamble on an early election? It appears investment banking has taught him nothing about risk management. 

Moving on to Sunak's condemnation of the Stonehenge climate protesters. 

It's always amusing to see the so-called "anti-woke" crowd get up in arms about the defacement of ancient megaliths in protests against fossil fuel use. These people, who often deride modern environmental and social justice movements as unnecessary or extreme, suddenly find themselves on the side of conservation when it comes to a pile of rocks. But the irony seems lost on them: the very cultures that built these megaliths were pioneers of "wokeness," living in harmony with nature and respecting the earth in ways today's fossil fuel advocates could never comprehend.

The ancient societies that erected these impressive structures did so with a deep understanding and reverence for their natural surroundings. They were the original stewards of the environment, practicing sustainable living long before it became a buzzword. So when the anti-woke brigade laments the damage to these monuments, they're unwittingly championing the values of the very cultures they claim to oppose. It's a delicious irony that those who mock the "woke" for their environmental concerns are now defending relics of civilizations that would likely scoff at their short-sightedness and environmental apathy.

Megaliths, museums and art galleries are monuments to human creativity, showcasing our greatest achievements and cultural treasures. They are filled with art that celebrates mankind's intellect, ingenuity, and imagination. Yet, these institutions, despite their immense value, cannot fully capture the raw beauty and grandeur of the natural world, a world that's under threat from fossil fuel vandals.

Nature's splendour, whether it's a breathtaking landscape, a vibrant field of flowers, or a serene forest, exists beyond the walls of any gallery. These natural wonders, with their intricate ecosystems and inherent tranquility, provide an irreplaceable source of inspiration and solace. They remind us of our connection to the earth and our responsibility to protect it. Open spaces have influenced poetry and music; oil never has - although you could make an argument for heavy metal.

As much as I cherish art galleries and museums for their role in preserving and presenting human culture, I believe that the health and preservation of our planet take precedence. The natural world is our most precious heritage, and its preservation is essential for the survival and well-being of all life on Earth. 

If faced with the choice, I would willingly sacrifice every museum and gallery to ensure the planet's future. Our legacy is not only in the art we create but also in the earth we care for and leave behind for future generations.

Sunak's plan for more oil and gas drilling is the greatest vandalism he could commit and even the courts are at loggerheads with him. 

First, let's acknowledge that climate change is a global issue, not a country-sized problem. The atmosphere doesn't care about borders or politics; it only responds to the accumulation of greenhouse gases. Ignoring our own responsibilities while pointing fingers elsewhere (usually China) is not only hypocritical but also incredibly short-sighted. 

Now, about China. Yes, China emits a significant amount of CO2, largely because it's the world's most populous country and a major manufacturing hub. But let's not forget why that is: Western countries, including ours, have outsourced their dirty industries to places like China to maintain our consumer lifestyles without dealing with the environmental fallout. So, in many ways, the carbon footprint of China's industries is actually part of the West's carbon footprint. 

Moreover, per capita emissions tell a different story. On average, a person in the West still emits far more CO2 than someone in China. So, if we're going to play the blame game, perhaps we should start with the mirror. 

Furthermore, according to the latest reports, China is providing over half of the world's renewable energy infrastructure. That's right, while some are busy pointing fingers, China is actually leading the charge in renewable energy development and in green technology jobs. This includes massive investments in solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, putting many Western countries' efforts to shame. If anything, China’s commitment to renewable energy should be a wake-up call to the West to step up its game. 

In addition, recent data shows that global fossil fuel consumption and emissions hit record highs in 2023. Despite the increase in renewable energy, the overwhelming demand for energy means fossil fuels still dominate the energy mix. China, however, accounted for 55% of global renewable additions in 2023, demonstrating a substantial commitment to green energy. 

Lastly, leadership means taking action, not waiting for others to act first. If the West, with all its wealth and technological advancement, can't lead the way in reducing emissions, how can we expect developing nations to do so? Our inaction sends a clear message: economic growth is more important than the planet's future. In conclusion, refusing to acknowledge anthropogenic climate change and shirking responsibility by pointing at China is not only scientifically ignorant but also morally bankrupt. It’s time to stop the blame game and start taking real, meaningful action.

Now let's come to VAT on private school fees and National Service.

In many countries, private school education offers significant advantages, often leading to better academic outcomes and enhanced career opportunities for students. Some governments offer VAT exemptions on private school fees, effectively subsidizing this choice, which means the rest of society has to foot the shortfall in government revenue.

Given the benefits derived from such tax advantages, it is worth considering the introduction of a civic duty in return, such as requiring children of parents who benefit from VAT exemptions on private school fees to engage in National Service.  In that way, parents who are doing without necessities, like Sky, can still afford to sent their progeny to a public school, putting the cost on their kids, who are the ones that actually benefit. It would be a choice, but I'd bet the children would want their parents for pay the VAT.

This proposal rests on the principles of fairness, social cohesion, and the fostering of civic responsibility. It ensures that the advantages gained from tax exemptions are balanced by a tangible contribution to society, promoting a more equitable and integrated community. By fostering a sense of civic duty and providing valuable life experiences, National Service can play a crucial role in the development of well-rounded, socially conscious young citizens whose parents have taken advantage of a tax loophole, rather than the super-confident, condescending, pompous, entitled, erudite, elitist shits like me and my fellow private school alumni.

It would appear that Sunak's election strategy can be summed up by one image I took yesterday. 

The Great British Dog Whistle, which happens to be shaped a bit like a prick, or is it Nigel Farage.

This image tells you all you need to know about Fuhrage:

You know, I'd bet ....... actually, I'd better not bet on politics......

I saw this on a window the other day: