The recent judgement to overturn Roe v Wade doesn't actually ban abortions, but merely pushes the decisions down to state legislatures, remembering that America is a Federal State.
However, those states that will enforce a ban on abortions must realise the paradoxes contained within their decision.
They maintain they are protecting the rights of the unborn child and protecting it from, essentially, its mother. However, once that child is born, the state says that the very person who wanted to 'kill' that child must now look after it.
I can see someone bringing a case against these states, insisting that the states take charge of the child and ensure it has a good life until such time as the child is legally capable of making its own decisions - such as owning a gun with which to possibly kill other people.
No comments:
Post a Comment