How can a fine for breaking Covid rules be in any way interpreted as 'largely not guilty', as I heard a Conservative MP opine yesterday morning when defending the Greased Piglet on the radio?
No fine is not guilty; one fine is guilty; multiple fines is a repeat offender.
"However, M'lud, the defendant robbed only one bank and, I humbly submit therefore, largely not guilty," ain't going to gain much traction in front of the Honourable Mr Justice Hangemall.
Also, I wonder why did the Met investigate only 2 of the 6 events Boris attended?
How was the investigation a waste of money, as Boris fanboys claim, when a) the police employed in the investigation are employees, not consultants, and would be paid anyway, and b) over a hundred fines were imposed, thereby justifying the investigation.
I now understand why some are so keen to support Boris; his epic incompetence makes theirs look trifling by comparison.
As an aside, why is theirs spelled theirs, not Their's?
No comments:
Post a Comment